32 Chailey Street
E5 0RX
- Terraced
- Freehold
- 4 bedrooms (estimate)
- 1,130 sq ft
- EPC D
What comparable sales show
Fair match£666,000
Range £552,000 to £779,000 · £589 per sq ft
Since last sale
−£498,500
−42.8% since Dec 2024, −25.6% a year
Rank in E5 0RX
6th of 6
Postcode average £1,209,000
From completed sales of similar homes nearby, adjusted for floor area. It cannot see condition, layout or recent work, so it is not a valuation.
In short
32 Chailey Street is a 4 bedroom freehold terraced in E5 of about 1,130 sq ft.
Comparable completed sales nearby put it at £552,000 to £779,000, about £666,000 in the middle.
That makes it the 6th highest of the 6 homes we can compare in E5 0RX, where the middle figure averages £1,209,000.
It last sold for £1,164,500 in December 2024; comparable sales suggest it has lost about £498,500 since, roughly −25.6% a year.
Across Hackney, average prices fell 1.6% in the year to August 2026.
Where in the range would yours sell?
Condition and improvements usually decide it, and only someone who sees the home can say.
Lower end
£552,000
Middle
£666,000
Upper end
£779,000
Done work since the records were made? Claim your home and tell us, or ask local agents where yours sits.
Sale history
Every sale of this home registered with HM Land Registry since 1995
| Sold | Price paid | Change | A year |
|---|---|---|---|
| December 2024 | £1,164,500 | First sale | – |
Homes in E5 0RX
Ranked by what comparable sales show. Choose one to see its page.
- 44 Chailey StreetTerracedSold Feb 2018 for £1.46m£1,805,000#1
- 28 Chailey StreetTerracedSold Jul 2014 for £1000k£1,429,000#2
- 30 Chailey StreetTerracedSold Dec 2023 for £1.16m£1,215,000#3
- 38 Chailey StreetTerracedSold Aug 2015 for £850k£1,080,000#4
- 40 Chailey StreetTerracedSold Oct 2010 for £470k£1,059,000#5
- 32 Chailey Street (this home)Terraced · 4 bed · 1,130 sq ftSold Dec 2024 for £1.16m£666,000#6
- 34a Chailey Street–
- 34b Chailey Street–
The completed sales behind the figure
Similar homes nearby, registered with HM Land Registry. Choose one to see its page.
| Home | Price | Sold | Size | Per sq ft | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 Elm Park RoadE10 7NX · Terraced | £655,000 | Nov 2025 | 1,098 sq ft | £597 | 1 mi |
| 72 Belvedere RoadE10 7NP · Terraced | £770,000 | Jan 2026 | 1,292 sq ft | £596 | 1.1 mi |
| 42 Sanderstead RoadE10 7PP · Terraced | £620,000 | Nov 2025 | 958 sq ft | £647 | 1 mi |
| 295 Church RoadE10 7BQ · Terraced | £605,000 | May 2026 | 1,163 sq ft | £520 | 1.4 mi |
| 31 Belvedere RoadE10 7NW · Terraced | £650,000 | Oct 2024 | 1,152 sq ft | £564 | 1.1 mi |
| 28 Flempton RoadE10 7NH · Terraced | £583,000 | Apr 2025 | 1,001 sq ft | £582 | 1.1 mi |
| 5 Radlix RoadE10 7BD · Terraced | £780,000 | Jun 2026 | 1,206 sq ft | £647 | 1.4 mi |
| 2 Millicent RoadE10 7LG · Terraced | £736,500 | Oct 2025 | 1,076 sq ft | £684 | 1.3 mi |
| 43 Burwell RoadE10 7QG · Terraced | £490,000 | Oct 2025 | 786 sq ft | £624 | 1 mi |
| 36 Tallack RoadE10 7JR · Terraced | £535,000 | Mar 2026 | 1,313 sq ft | £407 | 1.3 mi |
| 20 Millicent RoadE10 7LG · Terraced | £580,000 | Mar 2026 | 915 sq ft | £634 | 1.3 mi |
| 39 Radlix RoadE10 7BD · Terraced | £633,000 | Dec 2025 | 1,076 sq ft | £588 | 1.4 mi |
What buyers have paid in E5
Completed sales in the last 12 months, against the 12 months before
| Type | Sales | Average price | Average size | Per sq ft | On the year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All homes | 253 | £678,486 | – | – | −1.9% |
| Flats | 176 | £497,497 | – | – | +1.6% |
| Terraced | 69 | £1,118,325 | – | – | −2.2% |
| Semi-detached | 4 | £1,386,250 | – | – | −3.8% |
Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. Licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Energy performance data © Crown copyright. Licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Floor area and energy rating from the energy certificate of May 2024.
This page is built from public records. Is this your home? Claim it with your email and mobile to correct its details and add what has changed; your name and contact details are never shown. Something wrong? Contact us.